Be on the alert for staged auto collisions in San Diego!

Insurance Commissioner Poizner Warns San Diego Drivers to Be Alert for Staged Auto Collisions
Schemes Used by Scam Artists Endanger Other Drivers, Cost Unsuspecting Public

SAN DIEGO ― With summer vacation looming and many Californians traditionally driving more frequently or longer distances, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner warned area drivers to be alert for staged auto collisions. In 2006-2007, 14,565 referrals out of 24,011 insurance fraud referrals received by the California Department of Insurance – 61 percent – were for suspected automobile insurance fraud.

“Insurance fraud is like a $500 tax on every man, woman and child in California, and auto insurance fraud is a major part of this problem,” stated Commissioner Poizner.  “Staged collisions are not victimless, even when no one is injured, and an aware public is part of a great defense against these dangerous criminals.”

Nearly $164 million could have been lost by insurance companies in 2006-2007 if the auto insurance fraud wasn’t discovered.  Actual loses, however, are subsequently built into the insurance companies’ pricing structures.

In San Diego there were 985 suspected fraudulent claims (SFCs) in 2006-2007.  In fact, there were 41 arrests made on one case.

There are primarily three schemes typically used in staged collisions:

  • Panic stop
  • Start-and-stop
  • Swoop-and-squat

People who create these pre-planned accidents, also known as stagers, look for high value targets, such as commercial vehicles, expensive luxury vehicles, and vehicles owned by cities or counties.  They are considered “high value” because of the virtual guarantee of insurance coverage.

The following signs may tip-off a driver of fraudulent activity:

  • The other car is packed with passengers;
  • The other driver has a relatively new insurance policy;
  • The other car is in poor condition or has a “salvage” title;
  • Traffic was flowing smoothly and the other driver stopped suddenly;
  • The other driver and/or the passengers make extra effort to avoid conversation about the other vehicles in the area;
  • There is a witness that substantiates everything the other driver says; and
  • The other driver and his passengers all claim injury despite relatively minor collision damage to the vehicles.

If someone suspects he is the victim of a staged collision insist on a police report; document as much information from the collision scene as possible, using a cell phone to take photographs or video; ask the peace officer to positively identify everyone involved, report it to CDI at 800-927-HELP (4357) or go to:  www.insurance.ca.gov.

California Paint Capping Bill 1371 Passes Committee.

California State Senate Bill 1371 which specifically includes the following wording passed committee yesterday 10-0.

“Insurers shall not engage in capping. For the purpose of this section, “capping” means offering or paying an amount that is unrelated to a mutually accepted industry methodology used in determining paint and material charges that is accepted by automobile repair shopsand insurers.”

Click Here for yesterdays summary

The end of auto claims as we know it?

The USDOT along with the Integrated Vehicle Based Safety System initiative believe that driver assistance technology systems can reduce accidents by over 1.8 million per year. The focus of the study is specifically rear end collisions. In Germany, there is currently collision avoidance technology being tested actively and in another posting, I provided a link regarding the results. While technology can decrease accidents, there will still be accidents any time the human factor is involved.

Click here for the full story.

California Paint Cap Bill SB 1371 Amended.

Last week in California, SB 1371 was amended. The new amendment is up for hearing next on 6/25/2008

SB 1371:

   Existing law prohibits insurers from engaging in specified acts
relating to automotive repair.
   This bill would prohibit insurers from capping paint and materials
charges, as defined.

Some of the highlights are:

(a) Today, methodologies that are mutually accepted by both
automobile repair shops and insurers are available to determine the
cost of paint and related materials. These mutually accepted industry
methodologies include manuals and estimating systems that set out
the refinish labor units required to paint a particular portion of an
automobile, such as a hood, fender, rocker panel, and so forth. The
paint and material charge is calculated by multiplying the refinish
unit times the refinish rate. Additional mutually accepted industry
methodologies that are available involve software programs, which
calculate the paint and materials charges.  
   (b) "Capping" occurs when the cost of paint and related materials
determined by any of these mutually accepted industry methodologies
is ignored by an insurer. For example, a mutually accepted industry
methodology determines a cost of seven hundred dollars ($700.00) for
paint and related materials, and the insurer, as a standard practice,
offers three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00), an amount that is
unrelated to the paint and material charges that would be determined
by any of the mutually accepted industry methodologies. 

Click Here to read the amended bill.